2021 Update: This interview was refreshed for a Black Gate posting with a annotated/deleted chapter!
Bio: Stephen Leigh (SL) hails from Cincinnati and has professionally
published over 26 novels and ~50 short stories (including those in George RR Martin's WILD CARDS). Steve has several identities, having also written
under the pseudonyms “S. L. Farrell” and “Matt Farrell” in both the Sci-Fi and
Fantasy genres. He is a musician and vocalist too, active in several
local bands. Stephen teaches creative writing at Northern Kentucky
University and has mentored many via his teaching and his online essays.
SE: Pseudonyms & Genre Muses: You've written dozens of novels in various genres. Do you have different muses per genre?
SL: No, I just have wide tastes in what I like to read, which means I have similarly wide tastes in what I like to write. To my mind, there’s only one Muse, no matter what creative endeavor I’m engaged in or what genre I’m writing.
SE: Cross-over Muses: Is there any muse that inspired you to express something in multiple forms? If so, please identify the books/music that are connected. If not, have you considered linking the content of your music and writing?
SL: In CROW OF CONNEMARA, my latest book (like IMMORTAL MUSE, a stand-alone novel... sorta), one of the main protagonists is a musician. As a result, there’s a lot of Celtic music referenced and quoted in the novel, and at one point, he sings one of his ‘original’ songs… but of course that’s one of mine, actually. Unfortunately, though I’ve played the song out several times on gigs, I don’t have a recording of it to share…
Similarly, in the WILD CARDS shared world series (edited by George RR Martin), with which I’ve been involved since the beginnings way back in the mid-80s, one of my characters is “Drummer Boy”, who’s in a band called “Joker Plague.” The Joker Plague lyrics I’ve quoted in a few books in that series are all mine, some from songs I’ve written, other just made up for the situation.
SE: Fine Arts: You play in bands and write, but your
bachelor's degree is in Fine Arts. Any chance your foundations will emerge
publicly? Is there a sketch, photograph, or painting we can share?
SL: Here are a few… Below is a sketch I did a few years back --
of nothing in particular, just a landscape in my head...
|
S.Leigh Sketch |
Here are a couple others,
another pencil sketch and a watercolor, again imaginary landscapes.
|
S. Leigh Watercolor and Sketch |
|
A Miccail, by S. Leigh |
And just for a change of
pace, I drawing I did of a Miccail for DARK WATER’S EMBRACE, which never went
into the original publication, but was added when I got the rights back to the
book and re-published the novel through Arc Manor/Phoenix Press -- that
version’s still available on Amazon.
SE: Pubs and Beer: Is there a bar/pub within greater
Cincinnati/Newport that inspired Immortal Muses' "Bent Calliope"? Is there a coven of artisans
who meet there?
SL: I like the idea of a ‘coven’
of creative types, but I’m afraid not; the Bent Calliope was
wish fulfillment on my part. I’ve played music in (and had a drink or two in)
lots of bars and taverns over the decades. I wish here was a local bar like
that -- a kind of creative “Cheers” where everybody knows your name (and what
you wrote/composed/drew/painted/sculpted/published), and where a real Muse
occasionally dropped in to enhance what you were doing -- wouldn’t that be
nice!
But if one exists, I’ve yet
to find it. Alas.
SE: Art & Alchemy? Prior 1600, scientists and artists had overlapping
interests/skills; scientists had to draw their
own data in sketchbooks; conversely, artists had to craft/prepare their
own pigments and materials (via chemistry). Artists and alchemists frequented
the same apothecaries. The art & science of transmuting materials was a
shared goal. What inspired you to fictionalize alchemical history
and begin Immortal Muse?
|
Modigliani's Jeanne Hébuterne |
SL: Honestly, the alchemy came
in late in the process -- for me, inspiration for novels generally springs from
more than one source. Here’s how it
happened with IMMORTAL MUSE… (It’s a longish tale, so settle in…I’ll try to be
concise. Honest.) In January of 2010,
I’d finished A MAGIC OF DAWN, the last of the ‘Nessantico Cycle’ books (written
as “S.L. Farrell”) and I’d begun thinking about what I wanted to write
next. In the mornings, I generally go
through a short list of websites as part of my routine; one site was the BBC’s
“Pictures of the Day” (alas, they no longer do this…) where they collected
striking photographs from around the world.
That day, one of the pics showed a woman reflected in (I believe) a
hubcap, which stretched and elongated her figure. Huh, I thought, that reminds me of the
Modigliani paintings from my Art History classes… which sent me off googling
Modigliani.
In doing that, I noticed that many of Modigliani’s portraits
were of the same woman, Jeanne Hébuterne.
Here’s one. So I also googled Jeanne Hébuterne, and came across a photograph of her.
|
Jeanne Hébuterne |
I was immediately struck by
her, especially those wonderful, dark, soul-searching eyes. I looked up the incredibly tragic story of
the love affair between Jeanne and Amedeo (I’ll leave it to the reader to find
that for themselves). I also wrote a blog post about that bit of serendipitous
research, the last line of which was: “If a (much younger and unattached) me
were sent back to 1916 or so, I might go looking for Jeanne. Maybe I'll just
put her in a story instead...” Mind you,
I had no thoughts of actually doing that at that moment. But the thought was now in my subconscious.
So, moving on… I habitually read a lot of non-fiction (I
think of it as “mining for ideas”) and one such was a book by Francine Prose
called THE LIVES OF THE MUSES, about several well-known women who had been the
muses of and influenced the artistic creations of the artists whom they
loved. It was a decent book that I
enjoyed reading (though someone needs write a book which includes male muses…). And I started wondering: What if… What if
there was a genuine Muse, a person who literally did enhance the creativity of an artist? Maybe that could be my next book: an urban
fantasy around that concept. Hmm… But I couldn’t quite find the ‘hook’ I wanted
in that idea. (And so that thought went
into the subconscious hopper, too).
While I was flailing around,
I read through some old novel proposals I’d started and abandoned. One was about two immortal people chasing
each other through time. The proposal really sucked (which is why I never sent it out), but I
found that I still had some fascination with the core idea there. (Into the hopper…)
Thinking about immortality
took me into doing some research on alchemy, which quickly led me to Nicolas and
Perenelle Flamel, and the story that after Nicolas died (as a fairly rich man),
grave robbers broke into his tomb because they thought there might be valuables
buried with him… and found that the tomb was empty. And there were rumors that people had glimpsed
Nicolas and Perenelle long after their supposed deaths. Hmm…
Into the hopper.
I was also at the time reading another non-fiction book
(translated from French) called PARIS IN THE MIDDLE AGES, by Simone Roux. It looks at the same timeframe as the Flamels
(though it doesn’t particularly mention them) but there were lovely atmospheric
details in the book that drew me into wanting to set a story in Paris in that
time. Yes, into the hopper…
And (finally, at last!), at
a dinner with some friends, we started talking about vampires and why every
other book in the bookstores at that time seemed to be another vampire
story. (No, IMMORTAL MUSE has no
vampires!) I posited during that
conversation that one reason vampires had such popularity is that can potentially
live forever, and that hey, I might be willing to trade having to suck blood
from the living for that chance. (Into
the hopper…)
It all came together in the
shower, a morning or two after that conversation. (I know, try to get that
image out of your mind…) What if --
again, that lovely seminal phrase for so much science fiction and fantasy --
Perenelle Flamel had been Nicolas’ muse, and he hers in return? What if she, not he, created the
immortality potion that was half of the Philosopher’s Stone? What if that accomplishment really ticked off
Nicolas? What if -- as a result of
taking the elixir -- she was ‘cursed’ (somewhat vampirically, if I can coin a
word) by being required to ‘feed’ on creative energy: she must be a Muse for
the entirety of her immortal life? What
if Nicolas has also taken her potion and has been similarly cursed (though he
‘feeds’ on physical pain -- in the book, Nicolas is not a good person). He is chasing Perenelle through
time, eternally angry with her? What if some of these famous artistic muses of
history were actually Perenelle?
Aha… The structure of the
book began to fall together for me: a
‘present-day’ thread that would go through the entire novel, with historical
tales layered in-between. Why, Modigliani
and Jeanne could be one of those… I wrote up the proposal in a creative heat in
March of 2010 and sent it to Sheila Gilbert at DAW, who’s my editor; she loved
it. I started researching artists and
muses, and putting together the book…
Mind you, the book would
undergo several significant and major changes during the writing and
revisions. For instance, I wrote up a
long (15,000 words or so) historical segment with Modigliani and Jeanne that I
really liked, then realized that for a few good reasons it didn’t work with the
overall arc of the book, and ended up reluctantly cutting it. A similarly long and completed Nathaniel
Hawthorne sequence was likewise abandoned, as were unfinished segments with
Sonya Noskowiak (a photographer) and Artemisia Gentileschi (one of my favorite
Baroque painters). The Gustav Klimt,
Charlotte Salomon, and Antoine-Laurent de Lavoisier segments emerged late in
the revisions, partially as ‘replacements’ for the cut sections.
Sometimes, no matter how
fond you are of what you’ve written, no matter how much effort and labor you’ve
put into the creation of a segment, you have to kill it to make the book a
better book.
SE: Is there a specific
Klimt or Salomon work that you worked from?
SL: I’ve always been fascinated
by Klimt’s paintings and drawing, and his distinctive style. From a research standpoint, I read GUSTAV
KLIMT: Painter of Women by Susanna Partsch, as well as VIENNA MODERNISM
1890 – 1910 by Isabella Ackert, along with some online, spur-of-the moment
research at need. Again, I borrowed real
historical characters from his life and times, but the ‘Perenelle’ in this
timeframe, unlike most of the others, is entirely fictional.
|
Salomon's "Life? Or Theater?" |
Charlotte Salomon I hadn’t
been familiar with, but in researching artists of the WWII era (because I felt
I needed someone from that timeframe), I came across her and was fascinated by
her story. Like Anne Frank, her life was
tragically cut short, and who knows what she might have done had she
lived. Still, her evocative
autobiographical paintings are a great legacy.
For research there, I read TO PAINT HER LIFE: Charlotte Salomon in
the Nazi Era by Mary Lowenthal
Felstiner, as well as doing a fair amount of research into the political
environment in France at the time.
For those interested in what
was true and where I took fictional liberties in the various historical eras, I
detail that in the Afterword of IMMORTAL MUSE.
Waiting for a Muse: In your essay "TenThings I've Learned (As A Writer)" you address how mature professionals have to move past
waiting for their muses. Can you comment on your current relationship with your
muse? Is she understanding that you can't always work on her timing?
"4: Make writing a dirty habit
In
my early career, I waited for the muse to appear before I wrote. I thought
stories were supposed to flow in sparkling fire from my pen to the page, fully
formed and perfect. I’d always been told (by people who
weren’t writers themselves but who taught literature) that this
was how Capital-A Art worked.
That’s
complete and utter bullshit.
... What
I slowly realized was that if I hoped to forge a career as a writer, I couldn’t
wait for the fickle muse to appear. I had to write without her… because once
you start writing, the muse can’t stand to be left out and eventually shows up
at your side. The very act of writing attracts the muse to you." - S.L. Farrell
I think it’s more a matter
of me realizing that my job is to write, whether or not the Muse sits
down with me or not. If what spews out onto the page is crap, well, that’s why
we revise (and revise, and revise again).
Unlike the math tests I remember in school, writers don’t have to ‘show
their work.’ No one except the writer is
required to read the ugly, deformed drafts or view all the changes that get
made, scenes we’ve cut, rearrangements
we’ve made, mistakes we’ve made and corrected, essential foreshadowing we added
at the last minute, and so on.
If you persist, eventually the
Muse does show up. Eventually. At some point, things start
to gel and come together. All we give
our readers is the final, polished version. My task as a writer is to make sure
that what I send out to Sheila and other editors is the best I’m capable of
writing at the time. If I don’t like what I’ve written, then it doesn’t go out.
If I can honestly say that I couldn’t write the story any better than I’ve
written it at this point in time and with the skill that I currently have, then
I’ve done my job (and so has my Muse).
If the editor to whom I send
the piece passes on it, that’s their decision -- it happens. If a reader, once
the piece is published, doesn’t care for it, well, that happens too; I’ve no
control over that. Writers write. Once the writing is done and the work has
found a home somewhere, our job’s done.
Thanks to Stephen for taking the time for revealing all these details. Readers can
learn more about him via his blog and reading his work!